Between Britain, India & Muslims, Egypt.
The whole of this article is built on a conversation through messages on the page of ((truth of Islam)). Despite that who made this conversation with me did not discuss the articles on the page and talked about something else. maybe he thought it had a relation as both show the injustice that can happen from occupation to the land owners and he was completely right in that view even if it was not directly discussing the articles on the page. this person without saying his name said that he is from India and talked about the occupation that happened to his country by the English and how much suffer it was.
And that there is still some kind of pain even after these years. and that pain is showed in how much he cared to say that. the same on in my case and how much i care to show what Islam and Muslims are doing in Egypt not to mention that occupation is still on Egypt until that moment.
And that made me think to make a compare came to my head between the occupation of Britain to India and the occupation of the Arab Muslims to the land of Copts ((the pharaohs)). And it was amazing that it just was going with the article wrote before about Islam and democracy. Going with it and prove it and the idea in it more clear than words.
and it showed how much can be the similarities that can appear between different nations.
And before saying a word. occupation is occupation in all places of the world and when it happens that who ever is the leader of that occupation is a heart less human it brings out the most bad of the human race. and it becomes a labor that brings out of it every evil. and the worse which I came out to find and all will find with me is when the whole community of the occupier 's believes and minds are on that evil and see it as a good action. which made the only different between the two cases I compare. the occupation becomes the most evil and destructive.
so let's just try to start and put the compare on a points that can show the similarities and different between the English occupation to India and the Arab Muslims to Egypt.:
1) First of the reason of invasion.
In case of India in was business and resources of the country when the Indians made a rebellion against the British company in India. so the main reason was to manage to keep business and control resources .
In case of Egypt the reason of the Muslims' invasion divide into two reasons first was the evil teach of Quran to in killing and fighting and forcing Islam. and the second was as they were thieves and robbers and bandits which attack caravans and steal from it. and Egypt by this time was like the heaven of good on earth as it was described by the Historians in all times before Islamic invasion and occupation.
2) What did the occupation despite all it's bad things bring from good things to the land it occupied.
In case of India a loot of progress came to India through the English occupation and many advanced things came to. (but actually to be fair by the time of occupation Indians was not allowed to enjoy most of that advance but it was only to serve occupation.) . but after occupation gone it was still there for Indians.
In case of Egypt the Islamic invasion did bring no advance to Egypt as the nomadic people that live in desert inside tents and can not be compared to a great civilization like Egypt which had all kinds of elements of civilization. and had all kinds of arts and buildings and religion and science and knowledge and a town like Alexandria by this time was considered one of the three towns of knowledge in the whole ancient world. and Muslims themselves was astonished of what they saw for the first time. and instead of adding or bringing to that civilization. they as the historians by their time describe destroyed these civilization and started to destroy and burn and even burned the most valuable treasure of manhood which was represented in the library of Alexandria. when the ignorant nomadic khalifa sent a message saying we don't need other books beside Quran it carry all knowledge (Quran which says sun goes to a mud hole at night carry all knowledge). these are just examples which made one from the historians say about them they are the nation of Ruin. that is the only thing they are good in doing.
3) How did occupation deal with the people occupying their land.
In case of India it was very bad as it came after a fight and rebellion so the English acted very hard with Indians and Indians did not have almost any rights and it came to equal them with dogs and prevent both from entering certain places (despite the same English later. dogs became a part of their daily life in their country). and there were a force to the English civilization and even to Christianity between Indians (what will come will show how can humans be the same in bad actions but the only thing makes the different is the high standards and teach or believe the man follows. will it support that or stand against it. and can it turn it back to good course)
In case of Egypt. the occupation made it hard against the armless Copts of Egypt. as before Islamic occupation Egypt was occupied by the Roman. and Egyptians did not have an army. and the occupation took advantage from that to make hard conditions and forced them to pay tribute and prevented them from making festivals or religious ceremonies on public which Copts used to do across the towns and villages and across the whole country. and more over forced them to not ride horses but only donkeys and to not ride them as knights but by putting two legs on one side. to prevent them from being knights. and more over they forced them to Islam and persecuted them and killing them was not considered a crime. and more they attacked some women monasteries and took nuns to be sex slaves. and in that I remember a story about a nun that refused to have sex as she has made a promise to god to be virgin and the Muslim leader wanted her even by force so she made a trick and told him she can make paint for him that can make swords do not hurt his body but only needs to be virgin to do it and then she brought some paint and told him to try it on her first and placed some of it on her nick and told him to hit as much strong as he can. and so he did to figure out after that. that she preferred to die than to lose her promise with her God. and more criminal actions like bringing tribes and place them beside monuments to dig and steal from it which the today media call them Egyptian and protectors of temples instead of their fact as thieves and occupiers and even that effect of media came today to make movies like scorpion king talks about a bunch of Arab as Egyptians. (media is a more big story need a lot of time and articles.). and even the Islamic occupation forced Copts by one of the Muslim kings to wear a five kilo weight metal cross over their bodies or get killed to force them to leave Christianity and it came that Christians by this time used to be called the blue bone. because of their necks that turned blue from the weight of the cross. and more over a continue kill and elimination of a complete villages and thousands of people regularly under the Islamic occupation . and whole of what I said is just examples because many things are still there but can't put all books and researchers talked about that. and that can't be illustrated in few words as talking about 1400 years of occupation. Not forgetting to mention that Copts considered it a honor and a joy as their holy book taught them consider it every joy when you fall in different troubles knowing that the test of your faith produce patient. And patient produce hope and hope never fails.
4) How did occupation end . which will give and show how would the teach and believe and ideology make the different. as the example of the father and son again when a father teach his son to be good but he becomes to be bad not as his father taught him . when you go and tell his father. his father will condemn his son and say that is not my teach he is wrong and tells his son you are wrong you must stop that bad. on the contrary when the father is bad and the son is bad as his father taught him to be. which makes both father and son responsible for the bad done and both are evil.
In case of India it was the first recorded action ( as from what will come. it happened before but no one seen it or heard about and it did not success because the occupier did not accept it.) . It was independence and end of occupation through peaceful protests. and this was the first time in the whole world to success. And India gained it's independence . But the question is why and how?
First of all it was that great called Gandy or Mahatma Gandy which his Philosophy was built on Hindus philosophy which I talked about it before and it is like many religions call first for inside peace and peace between people . and that was the first part.( others before Gandy took his way because their religion and believe call the same which are the Copts. they shared first part but the second will come did not exist).
Second. It was the values and believes of the English people which when they did see a nation struggling for it's freedom peacefully and saw their own army committing crimes against them said that is wrong and had to end. because that does not go with our values and believes. which condemn that action. and that was the reason India managed to gain it's freedom peacefully for the first time such a thing happen in the whole history.
In case of Egypt. Occupation is still until now controlling Egypt and persecuting the Egyptians and refusing to leave or even give Copts their own rights under it.
Egypt had a very long history with peaceful protests and it was even before the Islamic occupation and under roman occupation and it was when they refused to change their face and the romans by this time were Christians which shows that occupation is always the same. which made their own believe condemn their actions against Copts even if they by this time did not listen or look at Jesus teach. and did bad to others. staying away from the teach inside the holy book. that says this was wrong and to be condemn
getting back to Islamic occupation which through 1400 many revolutions have been made against it one of them were military in the early of the occupation and failed. same as India and rebellion. and after that occupation controlled all Egypt and made every kind of persecution against them. for 1400 despite all their peaceful demands and way in living. and the last and most famous that the whole world have seen is when the occupation race army's tanks ran over the peaceful Christian protest in masbiro.
But what is the different between Britain and Muslims.
the first believe Christianity and human rights and values the second believe in Quran. which teaches him kill infidels (who do not believe in Islam). and make Islam every where . and that is what I talked about in Islam and democracy. as Muslims see it no bad to be occupiers with mean hearts they become happy when they hurt others and steal them and kill them.
which again put you back to a conflict as the thing that should carry the high standards of Muslims will not condemn them for doing bad but encourage them and promise them with sex in garden's of Allah after life. and condemn them if they did the good to others.
which brings me to the same end. Islam is an evil ideology. and it is time to liberate the whole world from it not just Egypt.
No comments:
Post a Comment